Home > Windows 7 > Windows 7 Will Be More Secure Than Linux And Leopard?

Windows 7 Will Be More Secure Than Linux And Leopard?

Furthermore, Bitlocker Hard Drive encryption is only in Enterprise and Ultimate versions. ACLs are fairly fine grained. No trojans is suppose to just get on the computer with out a prompt. If it has to be on to be inline with this nonsense then no thanks.. http://webgeninfosystems.com/windows-7/a-full-featured-windows-7-aero-to-starter-and-windows-7-home-basic.html

Should I pay more towards my mortgage? Windows lifespan - Stages of Development: Infancy: Windows 1.0-2.1 Toddler: Windows 3.0-3.1 Early Childhood: Windows 95 - 98 Childhood: Windows 2000 - XP Adolescence: Windows Vista Quote: The adolescent asks "Who Last edited by Neo Cyrus; 04-12-2009 at 01:05. First, however, let me clarify my statements a bit. http://www.sevenforums.com/general-discussion/7154-windows-7-will-more-secure-than-linux-leopard-2.html

This. Independent reviews of AV's have not shown false positives at that sort of rate. Neither system is immune to viruses, and we certainly have plenty of examples of this fact. Why was it tough?

What this means is that your computer is as safe as you make it. Message: Apple finally caught up. Windows 7 comes natively with powershell, a command line set of tools. Our prejudices get in the way of a logical debate.

commend line. It has the largest installed user base and therefore is a natural target for hackers. vbetts View Public Profile Find all posts by vbetts (#6) metaltoiletry Maha Guru Videocard: XFX HD5870 Processor: i5 750 Mainboard: Asus P7P55D Pro Memory: 8GB G.Skill DDR3 1333mhz http://forums.macrumors.com/threads/microsoft-claim-windows-7-will-be-more-secure-than-linux-and-leopard.686294/page-3 Here you can see that it didn't matter that the computer was safe since the user was attacked.

I call BS on this post You call BS? i agree that an OS is only as secure as the one using it but a lot can be said for "out of the box" security controls/configuration. I was using IE 8. My System Specs OS Windows 7 x86 build 7077 CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Motherboard ASUS P5Q-EM Memory G.Skill PC2-8000 2GB x 4 Graphics Card Visiontek Radeon AIW HD Sound

umm ok is this with or without the annoying UAC turned on? http://news.softpedia.com/news/Vista-SP2-and-Windows-7-More-Secure-than-Linux-and-Mac-OS-X-Leopard-109192.shtml Unix permissions are the same. Being a single user system essentially of course windows will implement the functionality in a different manner -- it's there but you have to look for it. Vista SP2 and Windows 7 More Secure than Linux and Mac OS X Leopard GO Microsoft claims Apr 10, 2009 17:08 GMT · By Marius Oiaga · Share: Windows Vista Service

By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. this contact form See above. I'm not sure I understand you post you saying installing in user level is bad or not??? So now what Apple is doing is making OS X better than Unix .

Mac OS X Leopard is good looking but Windows 7 is more user friendly. "LIFE IS LIKE AN ICE-CREAM SO ENJOY IT AS MUCH AS U CAN" Reply With Quote 23rd On the surface it would seem that closed source has the advantage here. KiwiNZAugust 21st, 2011, 08:17 PMI have one computer with windows 7 and a old computer windows vista.Funny thing is I got more malware on a computer with windows vist than a have a peek here KiwiNZAugust 26th, 2011, 05:42 AMThat is a very narrow minded thing to say.

The toughness, the tough launch that we had with the release of Vista was very brutal. And I’m convinced I’m safer on a Mac than I ever was on Windows. Most web sites would not work than.

People have got a lot more sophisticated in devising "Viruses" -- simple malicious code (to mess up your OS) or institure a DoS ("Denial of Service") are really old hat now.

Meh... Both systems have made great strides in making security controls accessible and understandable to the end user. Nice Post Reps added... cprofittAugust 23rd, 2011, 02:23 AMSo this was bad scripts on the page not bad flash , java or active-X?

I also like how Microsoft is trying to ween the world from XP's tit. In particular, I look for system files like executables and libraries to be in their own locations (e.g., /Applications, c:Program Files) and not generally modifiable by end users. This is Charlie Miller now talking about Lion. 1.5 years ago (the article you linked to): Now: Because the op's title say's "is now Much more secure" as if the assumption Check This Out The other OS's can do as they please as long as MY OS is fine.

Windows 7: Windows 7 Will Be More Secure than linux and leopard? The security holes that Microsoft refers to is with the code itself, hackers tend to use particular logical loop holes, back doors, or supply certain programs with arguments that lead to In the end, as far as Microsoft is concerned, the number-one priority is getting people off of Windows XP and onto at least Vista or Windows 7. Passware Proves Mac OS Lion Insecure Revealing Login Passwords in Minutes (http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/passware-proves-mac-os-lion-insecure-revealing-login-passwords-in-minutes-126166663.html) OS X Safe, yet horribly insecure (http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2011/06/23/os-x-%E2%80%93-safe-yet-horribly-insecure/) Very interesting articles.

The administrator account password.